According
to the piece of writing in the New York Times essay titled, "Where Sweatshops are a Dream," writer
Nicolas D. Kristof wished to propose a tour to the formal president Barack
Obama as well as his cabinet to a gigantic garbage dump in Phnom Penh before
they start acting on their talk about labor standards. This was stated in his
opening statement of his article, as a result, yield an opportunity for him to
expose how most families are surviving each day through a "garbage
dump" in the undeveloped areas or countries around the world.
Kristof addressed the president and his team as his main audience. He believes that by offering the government a tour, He would have a sense of humor to approach sweatshops in poorer countries prudently.
Kristof addressed the president and his team as his main audience. He believes that by offering the government a tour, He would have a sense of humor to approach sweatshops in poorer countries prudently.
Kristof goal is to allow sweatshops
operations in poverty-stricken countries because it a better option as compare
to working on “garbage dump”. He also aim to present to his audience
alternative ways of improving lives in poorer countries; thus, building their
manufacturing industries. For Kristof to accomplish this, he mainly uses pathos
to appeals to his audience emotion. For
instead, in Phnom, he stated that the children are "...ambling barefoot,
searching for old plastic cups that recyclers will buy for five cents a
pound." He further explained that "families actually live in shacks
of this smoking garbage"
For Kristof argument to work, he must earn trust from his highly educated audience; he does so by establishing his own credibility. Thus, by providing factual evidence as well as acknowledging what the families living in these filthy areas have to say. "I'd like to get a job in a factory...at least that work is in a shade". the most appealing of all testimonies according to Kristof, is a woman who "hopes her 10-years-old boy, scavenging beside her, grow up to get a factory job, partly because she has seen other children run over by a garbage truck". according to Kristof, this conveys how penniless families living in underprivileged countries consider sweatshops and factories jobs more preferable to a life where scavenge is the only means of survival.
Moreover, the author also uses logic to appeal to his audience emotions. thus since the location is in a "vast garbage dump," the "Miasma of toxic stink leaves you gasping, breezes better with filth, and even the rats look forlorn" He furthermore uses simile to described the environment as a "Dante-like version of hell."
Kristof ambition was to persuade his audience with logical facts that, a life of which rats refuses to live is not convenient for humans.
Kristof gained his personal experience about sweatshop by living in East Asia "watching as living standard soared- including those in his wife ancestral village in South China...." This encourages him to address the issue of poverty to the government in order to provide a solution.
The organization, and the use of evidence are effective, and well established in Kristof argument. He begins with a tour proposal, and he went further to outline what his audience are most likely to witness in case the proposal is accepted.
Kristof thesis was implied in his argument because he believes that his audiences are highly intellect personals. His pleading, on behave of the poor families, was built effectively, and his audiences are more likely to adopt his claim.
For Kristof argument to work, he must earn trust from his highly educated audience; he does so by establishing his own credibility. Thus, by providing factual evidence as well as acknowledging what the families living in these filthy areas have to say. "I'd like to get a job in a factory...at least that work is in a shade". the most appealing of all testimonies according to Kristof, is a woman who "hopes her 10-years-old boy, scavenging beside her, grow up to get a factory job, partly because she has seen other children run over by a garbage truck". according to Kristof, this conveys how penniless families living in underprivileged countries consider sweatshops and factories jobs more preferable to a life where scavenge is the only means of survival.
Moreover, the author also uses logic to appeal to his audience emotions. thus since the location is in a "vast garbage dump," the "Miasma of toxic stink leaves you gasping, breezes better with filth, and even the rats look forlorn" He furthermore uses simile to described the environment as a "Dante-like version of hell."
Kristof ambition was to persuade his audience with logical facts that, a life of which rats refuses to live is not convenient for humans.
Kristof gained his personal experience about sweatshop by living in East Asia "watching as living standard soared- including those in his wife ancestral village in South China...." This encourages him to address the issue of poverty to the government in order to provide a solution.
The organization, and the use of evidence are effective, and well established in Kristof argument. He begins with a tour proposal, and he went further to outline what his audience are most likely to witness in case the proposal is accepted.
Kristof thesis was implied in his argument because he believes that his audiences are highly intellect personals. His pleading, on behave of the poor families, was built effectively, and his audiences are more likely to adopt his claim.